<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linday Lohan&#8217;s Fight for Marriage Equality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hughryan.org/linday-lohans-fight-for-marriage-equality/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hughryan.org/linday-lohans-fight-for-marriage-equality</link>
	<description>Freelance writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:45:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://hughryan.org/linday-lohans-fight-for-marriage-equality/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughryan.org/?p=23#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve already emailed you about this amazing essay but I&#039;ll post a comment here too. So good to see a LGBT activist not being snobby and judgemental. I sent an email to the Advocate asking why they only gave 2 reasons as to why they had second thoughts about putting Perez &#039;Lesbophobe&#039; Hilton on the cover. They were, that he had posted the nude and explicit photos of Dustin Lance Black and that he had used the f word. I told them that the journalist who had done the report had not truly done his research properly. Had he taken on Hilton&#039;s website on any given day he would&#039;ve come across Hilton&#039;s tired SaMANtha Ronson schtick. Is that not another reason? Or are lesbians not important? Is lesbophobia not important? Am I correct in thinking that the Advocate is a LESBIAN, Gay, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER magazine? Because the Advocate often ignores the L, B and T part of the acronym.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already emailed you about this amazing essay but I&#8217;ll post a comment here too. So good to see a LGBT activist not being snobby and judgemental. I sent an email to the Advocate asking why they only gave 2 reasons as to why they had second thoughts about putting Perez &#8216;Lesbophobe&#8217; Hilton on the cover. They were, that he had posted the nude and explicit photos of Dustin Lance Black and that he had used the f word. I told them that the journalist who had done the report had not truly done his research properly. Had he taken on Hilton&#8217;s website on any given day he would&#8217;ve come across Hilton&#8217;s tired SaMANtha Ronson schtick. Is that not another reason? Or are lesbians not important? Is lesbophobia not important? Am I correct in thinking that the Advocate is a LESBIAN, Gay, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER magazine? Because the Advocate often ignores the L, B and T part of the acronym.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linday Lohan&#8217;s Fight for Marriage Equality &#124; health</title>
		<link>http://hughryan.org/linday-lohans-fight-for-marriage-equality/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Linday Lohan&#8217;s Fight for Marriage Equality &#124; health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughryan.org/?p=23#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post: Linday Lohan&#8217;s Fight for Marriage Equality [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post: Linday Lohan&#8217;s Fight for Marriage Equality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
